Legal Firms – Don’t Allow Outside Parties Using Social Media To Control Your Reputation

There’s a shadowy figure making Holland & Knight’s online footprints. What’s worse, whoever this is, is controlling the direction the conversation is going and it’s not pretty.

Since the end of December, @hklaw has been sending out on Twitter Tweets at the rate of approximately 20 per day. The tweets contain links that lead readers back to Investigator – Law Firm, whose profile lists six other sites, each describing it’s contents as “Information, Articles and Complaints involving Holland & Knight Attorneys.”

(Bear in mind that tweets are mini blog entries, and discoverable by search engines) The problem is, none of the blogs or the @hklaw Twitter page belong to the Holland & Knight law firm, who’s URL is www.hklaw.com.
I got wind of this when I retweeted one of HK Law’s posts, giving accolades to the firm for being forthright in their communication. @carolynelefant responded with “Did H&K put that stuff out?” So, I reviewed the tweets on hklaw’s Twitter page, and saw that the links contained in them lead back to HKLaw Investigator.


HK Law Investigations currently has 7 SEO online platforms publishing negative content

Investigator – Law Firm
http://posterous.com/people/KDDLNOIwdb

HK Law blog on Blogger
http://hklawinvestigations.blogspot.com/

HKLaw Investigation
http://hklaw.tumblr.com/

HK LAW on Twitter
http://twitter.com/hklaw

HK Law Investigation
http://hklaw.livejournal.com/

Holland & Knight Investigation
http://hklaw.wordpress.com/

What’s so?
Holland & Knight’s official website www.hklaw.com, is beautifully designed with an abundance of viable information reflecting it’s commitments. Their corporate communications area has been diligently producing newsletters covering the span of the firm’s practices. They also send out press releases at the rate of approximately 2 per month.

Journalists are picking up on HKLaw Investigation’s information too, and every article that gets published on the internet containing anything negative about Holland and Knight is being republished on these sites. This is a vicious circle.


What’s not happening?

Holland & Knight is not generating and publishing their own positive, web friendly, interactive information themselves. They don’t have a blog, they don’t have a Twitter presence, and they’re not monitoring their online conversation and interacting accordingly.

The newsletters and articles they are publish are not internet friendly, interactive, or detectable by search engines. Therefore, the communication coming from Holland & Knight is doing nothing to combat the negative coverage that HKLaw Investigations is distributing.

I sent an e-mail to their media relations department to ensure they are aware of what was going on. If they were, there should be something/anything, that interacted with and acknowledged HKLaw Investigation’s commentary, or at the very least – their existence.

What can legal marketers do?

It will be very interesting to see what Holland & Knight does to rectify this situation. This scenario could have been avoided if Holland & Knight’s marketing and media relations areas were watching their news with some simple tools. Or ,at the very least quieted it within the first few blog posts and Tweets sent out.

Ford’s head of social media, Scott Monty, was able to avoid a public relations crisis by doing exactly that.

Legal marketers, if you are not at the forefront of your online conversation someone else is going to be. I can not stress this enough. Obviously, now is not the time to be cutting back on your firm’s social media budget and be caught with your guard down. Law firms, if you’ve been skeptically sitting back on your heels waiting for evidence to prove social media’s viability for the legal industry, the jury’s verdict has just come in.

Related Posts:

Online Reputation Crisis – An Update of Holland and Knight’s Annonymous Naysayer: HK Law

Tragedy in the wake of Holland & Knight layoff’s highlights unspoken economic ramifications and the future of negative on-line commentary

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Tags: , , , ,

This entry was posted on Thursday, January 15th, 2009 at 10:03 am and is filed under Legal Marketing Tactics, Legal Marketing Trends, Social Media. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

17 Responses to “Legal Firms – Don’t Allow Outside Parties Using Social Media To Control Your Reputation”

  1. Russell Lawson Says:

    Kara -

    This is great detective work and cogent content about the risks of internet reputation ambushes. I learned about your blog from one of our attorneys and now I’m putting it on my Favorites. Thanks.

  2. Kara Smith - Karasma Media Says:

    Thank you Russell. Considering that law firms are always going to be on one side of an issue, it’s inevitable that someone is going to be discontent with what they’re doing. All the more reason for the legal industry to incorporate social media into their marketing strategies, sooner rather than later.

  3. jayne navarre Says:

    Thank you, Kara, for this great reporting. You are dead on that it is the responsibility of all law firm marketing teams to get a handle on social computing and follow their firm’s online footprint vigilantly.

    While presenting introductory material on social computing to lawyers and legal administrators over the past 12 months I have been emphasizing the importance of reserving the law firm’s name on Twitter (NOW) even if they do not yet participate, and certainly reserve all URL configurations of the name with .net and .mobi at the very least. Any firm that does not own the url of their full name spelled out e.g. jonesjonesandjones.com instead of jjjlaw.com or jjj.com should try to secure it NOW!

    Your story is an incredible example of unethical business practices that are only getting more rampant as Web use for fighting personal battles against organizations and making political views even more contentious than those at the cocktail party. As communications and marketing becomes more ubiquitous on the Web, law firms MUST protect their good name and reputation to the best of their knowledge.

  4. Kara Smith - Karasma Media Says:

    Jane – Thank you for your comments. You’re making extremely good points about law firms owning their URLs across domains, and the immediacy necessary for them to take action. It’s always better to deal with emergencies prior to their coming to fruition, so indeed NOW is a good time. Hopefully, more people who need to read this kind of information are, and are taking the actions we’re directing them toward.

  5. lawyers firms Says:

    So many lawyers are working in law firms and offices to solve the legal problems of people. They have vast experience to understand the legal issues of family members. Experienced family lawyers in law firms provide proper guidance and supervision to fulfill the demands of clients.

    http://www.lawyersindemand.com/

  6. paisley Says:

    Did anyone at the law firm think about trademarking their name?

    the damages from somethinbg like this when the appropriate steps have been taken to trademark a business entity would go far is making this go away in a day or two.

  7. Joseph Fiore Says:

    Kara,

    Thanks for advancing an extremely worth discussion and for sharing this specific incident. I’d like to cross-post a past comment shared on a timely post on Online Marketing Blog which highlights some of the important points raised here.

    As your post clearly demonstrates, the idea of monitoring online brands and reputations needs to go beyond a collection of feeds and searches for online mentions, and needs to be comprehensive enough to cover intentionally mispelt domain names, free-blogging platforms (i.e. brandXYZ.blogspot.com), Twitter, MySpace urls, YouTube, gmail, spoofed IP’s, text/banner ads, and piggyback spammers that could be potentially broadcasting their dodgy messages using unguarded domain names, harvested email addresses or even unused online profiles.

    This can be a daunting and time-consuming task, and our firm has assisted many companies by helping them stay on top of such incidents and helping avert the risks associated to online brand assault. IMHO, your final point about getting caught with your guard cannot be overstated, and in our shared interest to help raise awareness, we can only hope your message inspires those who have been reluctant to recognize the importance of being proactive about online brand and reputation management.

    Joseph
    @RepuMetrix

  8. Kara Smith - Karasma Media Says:

    Joseph –Thank you for your comments and cross-link.

    My hope is that name-holders will take heed of this incident and treat it as a precautionary warning. Unfortunately, I’m afraid more people are going to have to learn the hard way, than not.

  9. Kara Smith - Karasma Media Says:

    Regarding the issue of copyright…
    I strongly doubt Holland & Knight had hklaw copywritten.

    It appears that whomever is behind the commentary is too savvy to not have done their homework — thoroughly. They set up several domains with the HK law to have gone to the trouble of setting up these fairly intricate domains.

  10. lucas law center Says:

    Very nice, I agree with you there Russel Lawton with “great detective work”. Great blog.

    LLC

  11. Karasma Media » Blog Archive » Online Reputation Crisis – An Update of Holland and Knight Annonymous Naysayer: HK Law Says:

    [...] & Knight’s negative, online conversation several months ago, when I wrote my original post: Legal firms dont allow outside parties Shed some light on disgruntled players within the construct of any large law firm and you’re [...]

  12. Karasma Media » Blog Archive » Holland & Knight layoff tragedy highlights unspoken economic ramifications – And and a moral question about negative on-line commentary Says:

    [...] Related Posts: Legal Firms – Don’t Allow Outside Parties Using Social Media To Control Your Reputation [...]

  13. law firm – Supreme Court Justices Unethical Behavior? Says:

    [...] Karasma Media by Kara Smith » Blog Archive » Legal Firms – Don’t … [...]

  14. Bob M Says:

    Thanks for bringing this issue to the light. Its not something I’m familiar with but I plan on investigating it further. Could cause a lot of problems if the wrong people keep doing this.

    Anyway, thanks for sharing.

    Bob M

  15. Kara Says:

    Hi Bob -
    Keeping on top of what’s happening in the social media world, how it effects legal marketers and keeping track of pertinent information for my clients is what I do.

    Thank you for checking in and taking the time to respond!

    Kara

  16. Don Says:

    As a Houston Personal Injury Lawyer you really hit a topic I worry about as the competition is fierce and it is not beyond my competitors to attempt to manipulate reputation online. Thanks for the heads-up and I’ll keep reading for tips!

  17. Kara Says:

    Thanks so much for commenting Don. Nothing to worry about — ongoing action is the key!

Leave a Reply

CAPTCHA Image CAPTCHA Audio
Refresh Image